Skip to main content

Serialized headaches when you combine .NET Core and .NET 4.6

When I'm involved in an application development project, I try all the time to keep the language ecosystem reduced as much as possible. Even if we are leaving in a world where interoperability is higher than ever, there are times when because of this you can lose a lot of time because of it.

Let's take the below example:
  • An Azure Function application wrote in .NET 4.6 that send messages to Azure Service Bus Topic. Inside the message body content is serialized in JSON format
  • An Azure Web App application wrote in .NET Core that receives messages from Azure Service Topic and displays it on the UI.

Everything it is okay until you run the code and an error occurs during deserialization. When you take a look at what you send and receive you see the following:

.NET 4.6 OUTPUT:       @ string 3http://schemas.microsoft.com/2003/10/Serialization/�k{"CountryCode":"RO","AlertType":0,"Level":5,"ValidFrom":"2018-04-05T10:14:00.0458475Z","Period":"00:02:00"}
.NET Core EXPECT:    {"CountryCode":"RO","AlertType":0,"Level":5,"ValidFrom":"2018-04-05T10:14:00.0458475Z","Period":"00:02:00"}

Both implementations are using Newtonsoft library for content serialization and deserialization, but it seems that the behavior is different.

.NET 4.6 Sample
string jsonWeatherAlert = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(weatherAlert);
BrokeredMessage message = new BrokeredMessage(jsonWeatherAlert);
message.Properties.Add("countrycode", weatherAlert.CountryCode);
topicClient.Send(message);
.NET Core Sample
string bytesAsString = Encoding.UTF8.GetString(message.Body);
WeatherAlert alert = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<WeatherAlert>(bytesAsString);

The root cause of this problem is related to what kind of default serializer it is used behind the scene. One of them it is using DataContract and bytes directly from the stream VS the other one that it is using DataContractBinarySerializer and GetBody<Streeam> to load all bytes.
This difference has a direct impact not only on the Newtonsoft library but also to Service Bus library if you want to use it directly.

To solve the problem you need on the sender or received to change the default serializer library that it is used. In our case, we updated the .NET 4.6 implementation in the following way.
var jsonSerializar = new DataContractJsonSerializer(typeof(WeatherAlert)); 
BrokeredMessage message = new BrokeredMessage(weatherAlert, jsonSerializar); 
message.Properties.Add("countrycode", weatherAlert.CountryCode); topicClient.Send(message);

If you want to find more about it, I invite you to read the following link discussion https://github.com/Azure/azure-service-bus-dotnet/issues/239

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(

Azure AD and AWS Cognito side-by-side

In the last few weeks, I was involved in multiple opportunities on Microsoft Azure and Amazon, where we had to analyse AWS Cognito, Azure AD and other solutions that are available on the market. I decided to consolidate in one post all features and differences that I identified for both of them that we should need to take into account. Take into account that Azure AD is an identity and access management services well integrated with Microsoft stack. In comparison, AWS Cognito is just a user sign-up, sign-in and access control and nothing more. The focus is not on the main features, is more on small things that can make a difference when you want to decide where we want to store and manage our users.  This information might be useful in the future when we need to decide where we want to keep and manage our users.  Feature Azure AD (B2C, B2C) AWS Cognito Access token lifetime Default 1h – the value is configurable 1h – cannot be modified

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see