Skip to main content

Story - Developers that don’t understand the business of the application

This days I participate to a presentation of a product. The idea of the product was great, I think that they will have a lot of success in the future.
Being a technical presentation, the presentation was held by one of the developers of the team. From this point of view this was great, because the audience was developers and other technical person. He could respond to a lot of question related to architecture, scalability, protocol that were used, base concept and so on.

Until….

Someone asked about something related to business idea and what kind of problem this application will solved….

In that moment our developer stopped……..

He could not give an answer….

And…he sad…
I’m a technical person, is not my business to know the business of the application!

In that moment I freeze. How the hell you can develop an application without understand the business? This is one of the biggest mistakes that can be done by a team member – refuse to understand the business of the application. Before thinking to a solution it is a have to understand the business of the application itself.
How you can resolve a problem without understanding the problem itself?
Being a monkey, a monkey with keyboard is great for a monkey. But when you need to solve a problem and give a solution, being a monkey with keyboard is not enough… This is how you end up with an airplane when a customers wanted a car.

Comments

  1. a simple developer should at least try to understand the client business and show the desire to do so - if he is prevented to do so, as it happens sometimes, that's another story..

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(

Azure AD and AWS Cognito side-by-side

In the last few weeks, I was involved in multiple opportunities on Microsoft Azure and Amazon, where we had to analyse AWS Cognito, Azure AD and other solutions that are available on the market. I decided to consolidate in one post all features and differences that I identified for both of them that we should need to take into account. Take into account that Azure AD is an identity and access management services well integrated with Microsoft stack. In comparison, AWS Cognito is just a user sign-up, sign-in and access control and nothing more. The focus is not on the main features, is more on small things that can make a difference when you want to decide where we want to store and manage our users.  This information might be useful in the future when we need to decide where we want to keep and manage our users.  Feature Azure AD (B2C, B2C) AWS Cognito Access token lifetime Default 1h – the value is configurable 1h – cannot be modified

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see