Skip to main content

Windows Azure Websites - Shared and Reserved mode

I think that we all of us already heard about Windows Azure Websites. This new feature of Windows Azure offers us the possibility to deploy websites very fast. Even for the first deploy, the deploy time can be very low.
What I would like to talk about today is the two different modes of Websites. The first one is Shared Website Mode. What does it means is that we don’t have a dedicated compute power. All the processor power is shared between our websites and other websites. From the performance perspective the performance will not be great. Is like hosting the websites to a classic hosting, that for 400$ per year host your application on IIS.
The other mode is the Reserved one. For this case we have dedicated resources that are allocated only to our application. We don’t share processor, memory or anything else. For this case we have 3 types of sizes (Small, Medium, Large) that we can set. Also we can specify the numbers of reserved instances from 1 to 3.
An interesting thing at Reserved mode is that even if we have dedicated resources we don’t have control to the machine. Our application is hosted on the IIS. This is why when we create a website on Windows Azure, the initializing time is very very low. For each reserved size, in this moment we have the following resources allocated: 1, 2, 4 cores and 1.75, 3.5, 7GB memory. The storage space is the same for all, 10GB.
Let’s wee when we could use Shared and Reserved mode. For the case when we create a demo application, or we have a blog or a site that is not very visited we can use Shared mode. When the traffic increases we should go with Reserved mode. A nice there will be a moment when we will not be able to use the website because our application need more resources and we will need to use a web role. The switch between them is not so simple if we didn’t use a web role until now. In the future I expect some tools that will make this migration automatically for users.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(

Azure AD and AWS Cognito side-by-side

In the last few weeks, I was involved in multiple opportunities on Microsoft Azure and Amazon, where we had to analyse AWS Cognito, Azure AD and other solutions that are available on the market. I decided to consolidate in one post all features and differences that I identified for both of them that we should need to take into account. Take into account that Azure AD is an identity and access management services well integrated with Microsoft stack. In comparison, AWS Cognito is just a user sign-up, sign-in and access control and nothing more. The focus is not on the main features, is more on small things that can make a difference when you want to decide where we want to store and manage our users.  This information might be useful in the future when we need to decide where we want to keep and manage our users.  Feature Azure AD (B2C, B2C) AWS Cognito Access token lifetime Default 1h – the value is configurable 1h – cannot be modified

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see